I’ve often wondered about the heroes of faith found in Hebrews 11. When Abraham left his family, his country, his employment, what was he thinking? Was he “full of faith” and confidence or really, really scared? Or what about Gideon leading his few hundred men to battle against the thousands of Midianites? If he wasn’t afraid, he must have been an idiot.
Is faith the absence of doubt or action in spite of doubt?
I have been very much blessed by the writings of Erwin R. Mcmanus (author of many books and pastor of Mosaic). The first book of his that I ever read (An Unstoppable Force) held that to have faith did in no way mean to be without doubt, fear, anxiety, etc. Rather, to have faith meant to trust God in spite of your doubts, fears, anxieties. (If I had my book here, I’d tell you what page number that was from.)
That makes a lot of sense to me, more sense than to think that faith means somehow ignoring the facts.
So, why do we act by faith, then, if there is still doubt?
Maybe some of those great moments of “faith” were actually moments of vast desperation.
I think for the friends who lowered the paralyzed man through the roof (in Luke 5), faith was an act of desperation. I can’t imagine none of them had any doubts about whether Jesus would respond kindly or not. (They just tore about the man’s house, for cryin’ out loud! I’d be seriously doubtful of a kind reception.) But I can believe those men were desperate, clinging to a thread of hope that maybe, just maybe, Jesus would overlook their impertinence, their impatience, their lack of social grace. And maybe, just maybe, he would choose to heal their friend.
I think those men showed great faith, but it was faith in the presence of doubt, not in the absence of it.
Comment to “A Boy and a Dog”
February 24, 2009I’ve recently been reading John Eldredge’s book “The Way of the Wild Heart.” (Check it out at amazon.com, then go buy it at abebooks.com, alibris.com, or christianbookbag.com for half the price.) I definitely recommend this book for any guy and especially for fathers or father figures. Eldredge takes a look at six areas of a man’s life (the beloved son, the cowboy, the warrior, the lover, the king, and the sage) and shows biblically how to live out that area to the fullest. It’s a much more balanced book than “Wild At Heart” in my opinion.
Anyhow, in his chapter describing man as lover, Eldredge describes two common mistakes men have made concerning their hearts: (1) give in to whatever passions come and (2) discipline the heart ruthlessly. Speaking of the second, he writes, “But discipline without healing doesn’t work real well over time, and it can do great damage to our hearts, which begin to feel like the enemy so we’ll do what we can to kill them in order to avert disaster” (Eldredge 2006, p. 210).
That’s the impetus for “A Boy and a Dog.” It’s the story of a boy being forced to kill his undisciplined dog but it’s also the story of mankind killing his heart and his love for fear of what may come. It hurts, it numbs us, but it’s safe.
I for one want a whole heart, even if it’s not necessarily the safest thing in the world. Men, after all, are made in the image of God, and God is far from safe. As C. S. Lewis put it in “The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe” (p. 75-76):
“If there’s anyone who can appear before Aslan without their knees knocking, they’re either braver than me or else just silly.”
“Then he isn’t safe?” asked Lucy.
“Safe?” said Mr. Beaver. “Don’t you hear what Mrs. Beaver tells you? Who said anything about safe? ‘Course he isn’t safe. But he’s good. He’s the King, I tell you.”
Tags:aslan, boy, c.s.lewis, comment, dog, eldredge, heart, narnia, safe
Posted in Comments | Leave a Comment »